Global Warming (or is it Global Cooling?)

November 16, 2014

Has Global Warming increased or become more destructive since I opened this blog?

Hi Folks,


Its quite a while since I posted anything on this blog.

Thanks a million to all of you who have steadily visited with very little effort on my part to attract you here.

Have been getting a lot of references from facebook. I’m not quite sure what is being discussed there but it all seems real healthy to me.

I came across this video which says it all.

Welcome to the seventeenth year since the planet stopped warming. As for all these officials in the UN, IPCC, EPA and the government of New Zealand, (to name just a few), who are busy enjoying the junket of AGW that allows them to extract more taxes from the normal people so they can spend it on “fighting” global warming. I say P**s on you.





PS A fact that many people are now aware of is that Climate Change, Global Warming or what ever, was born from the United Nations, the aim it seems, in order to manufacture a world crisis.

The UN objectives that it has been working on since its inception.

Bureaucracies always gain a life of their own, and as bureaucracies go, the UN has to be among the biggest. It would help if the top officials  indeed all responsible officials, were democratically elected but that seems to have never been the case.

Anyway the UN is in your governments legislation, local government and your education system. And although this appears to be good, and indeed most of us welcome it.

I have spent a lot of time studying the various UN programs and when you go below the surface, just a little, one finds the fact that its a hidden army of tigers who are not in the least bit friendly.

Check my blog on and see what they are trying to do to my city.





  1. Quote *buys him votes from a gullible New Zealand public.*
    We aren’t all like that and I thought JK was just a show pony.
    I wish you had never put the thought in my mind of Helen Clark with no clothes on. I try to avoid the mirror myself.
    Good video of William Happer. A very sane man.
    The other day the temperature here in Masterton, NZ went up 6c in an hour and a half and I survived.
    The UN basically took over from the League of Nations and has been equally as useless in what it was formed for. I also remember from more than ten years ago that there were 36 different Quangos formed within the UN to do with climate change. They gobble money endlessly but produce very little of substance.
    Keep up the good work.

    Comment by mikebartnz — February 5, 2018 @ 11:00 pm | Reply

  2. its great

    Comment by triyono saitama — May 14, 2017 @ 1:43 am | Reply

    • Thanks for commenting on my Blog.
      There are two things I suspect you need understand.
      1. Empirical evidence and data. What is it and where it is used in Global Warming “Science”
      2. Karl Popper’s papers on Hypothesis’ Does it apply here and is it used in Global Warming “Science”

      Here is a link that may help you understand.



      Comment by rogerthesurf — May 14, 2017 @ 5:13 pm | Reply

  3. I wrote a reply this AM to a comment by Roger on the Climate Denial Crock of the Week blog, but it was eaten by the WordPress Monster and disappeared. I will try again—-since no one is looking at that thread anymore but roger the attention-seeking smurf, it matters not whether it appears there once, twice or twenty times in slightly different forms if and when WordPress releases it. Roger won’t “get it”. Again. This time, or ever. Since it won’t “take” on Crock, I am posting it here on Roger’s blog at his invitation. I am sure he will want to “destroy” me yet again in reply—it’s the nature of the beast.. .

    (Roger’s comment to me—part of a lengthy exchange on the “End of the Road for Fossil Fuels in Sight” thread—-go to Crock if you want to see it all).


    Here is my last word.

    I is apparent to any sensible person that your bluster and incoherent objections towards my comment have not in the least elevated your denials to anything resembling facts or truth.

    On the other hand I have used facts including the author’s own data to question his written conclusions.

    You have attacked my person and intelligence but never used facts to strengthen your argument.

    I have shown you the data, but you have been unable to understand it’s significance let alone use it in any rational discussion.

    In other words, all you have managed to do is deny facts and have obviously become angry because I have undermined your faith which is that all things to do with the sky falling/doom predictions that the earth is going to over heat etc must be true.

    I also point out that you went to my blog where you are welcome to comment but chose instead to do it here.

    As I deal only in verifiable facts,you have found it impossible to contradict my assertions because you have no facts of your own to support your own assertions.

    I can only hope you have learnt a lesson and may try and equip yourself with factual knowledge in order to support what beliefs you have.



    (My reply to Roger)

    “Here is my last word”, says Roger. Good, that means he will stop posting his smelly piles of ignorant horseshit on Crock and the air will be allowed to clear.. I am going to renege on my own “last comment” promise there so that I can help Roger embarrass himself once more by pointing out the failings in his comment (and his thinking).

    First, Roger says that I went to his blog where I am “welcome to comment but chose instead to do it here” (on Crock). Yes, I did visit his blog briefly to see what he was about, but ran screaming for the exit when I felt my brain starting to melt. With just one brief visit to his blog, I discovered that roger engages in l-o-o-o-o-o-o-ng and mindless exchanges with such well-known geniuses as stefanthedenier and scottishskeptic, gives links to articles from American Stinky Thinker by Heartland stooges, praises Monckton and the Oregon Petition, and rants about the evil UN and Agenda 21, to say nothing of his clipping and pasting of denier “science” that he doesn’t understand. I would sooner lie down in the middle of the interstate during rush hour than spend any time visiting his blog.

    Roger’s “last word” comment again reveals to us that roger is an ignorant, narcissistic, whiner that is unable to deal with anyone pointing out his failure to understand Cook’s work (or any other real science). Extracting the phrases from his comment leaves almost nothing else, and proves yet again that he has nothing to say. To wit

    It is apparent to any sensible person…
    bluster and incoherent objections towards…
    anything resembling facts or truth….
    I have used facts including…
    attacked my person and intelligence…
    never used facts to strengthen your argument….
    you have been unable to understand it’s significance…
    let alone use it in any rational discussion….
    I deal only in verifiable facts…
    you have no facts of your own….
    impossible to contradict my assertions…
    all you do is deny facts…

    (and he asks why we attack his “intelligence”? Lord love a duck!)

    Roger says that I have “obviously become angry”? Actually, I’m not angry at all, and am enjoying helping Roger to continue to embarrass himself on Crock. It may be a bit cruel of me to take advantage of roger, since he is obviously cognitively deficient, but HE came to Crock and asked for it, I did not seek him out.

    “I can only hope you have learnt a lesson” says roger the smurf in closing. Yes, we have indeed “learnt”. I and all who have read your latest crap have all “learnt” that morons like you DO indeed walk the planet, and that you DO have the intelligence of a brick. Thanks for proving my point yet again.

    Comment by dumboldguy — July 22, 2015 @ 11:01 am | Reply

    • Thanks BoldDumbGuy,

      Not in the least embarrassed. I deal with your sort just about every day.

      If any of my visitors are interested in this conversation you are welcome to check out

      Usually this sort of conversation ends on my other site
      shortly after the site owner starts to panic when he has to face real facts, but in this case the owner of the site let it run.



      Comment by rogerthesurf — July 22, 2015 @ 7:03 pm | Reply

      • Dumbboldguy,

        Unless you have something new,factual and constructive to add to my blog, I will simply spam your further comments. You have had your say and everyone can see you for what you are and we will leave it at that.



        Comment by rogerthesurf — July 24, 2015 @ 11:52 am

  4. Reblogged this on kingbum78's Blog and commented:
    Interesting view on the UN that I don’t dispute…If any of you are religious view the UN very suspiciously it could one day be that one world government

    Comment by kingbum78 — April 26, 2015 @ 10:35 pm | Reply

  5. Its very simple to explain, really. 100 BILLION $$ is the figure the UN want to grab from the rich countries and they concocted this story that if we don’t tax the people to death, we will all die because the planet will get very angry.

    Comment by Bernard Saavedra — January 27, 2015 @ 9:24 am | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: