This is the first time I have ever seen a candid analysis of the “causes” of Global Warming on mainstream news and TV.
This deserves a close viewing and be sure to post it around all the sites you can!
Wow!
Please leave a comment!.
Cheers
Roger
October 22, 2018
9 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Global Warming (or is it Global Cooling?) 
Hi Roger. I tried playing the video but is says video is unavailable as it is private.
Robin
Comment by Robin Mead — September 20, 2019 @ 9:48 am |
Sorry Robin, The video was on Youtube and my site linked to it for a number of years. However recently it has been removed. Pity because it said a lot of logical things. Thanks for passing by. Cheers Roger
Comment by rogerthesurf — September 20, 2019 @ 5:19 pm |
Very interesting interview. Michaels exposes the lies in CAGW and points out that there really has been no warming other than in all the models that are running hot. Less than 1 degree C in the past 100 years is not only perfectly natural for the planet emerging from the Little Ice Age but is extremely small. None of this is due to increasing Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere, CO2 increases follow warming, Do NOT cause it. The primary effect of increased CO2 has been increased productivity and a greener planet. This is a good thing! More food to feed people!
Comment by pameladragon — October 24, 2018 @ 8:45 pm |
A brilliant video. A bit long to watch but full of good information. Would be useful to have a transcript for those who do not have time to watch the full video.
Comment by LitteOil — October 23, 2018 @ 1:44 pm |
After a “close viewing”, the only place I posted this piece was in my “trash” folder. Here’s a better one to spread “everywhere you can”. It helps to explain why Levin, Michaels, and Roger and the Deniers (a good name for a rock band) have met with such success in confusing the issue, at least in America. The truth is that 97% OR MORE OF ALL CLIMATE SCIENTISTS BELIEVE IN AGW AND ARE GREATLY CONCERNED THAT IT IS LEADING TO CATASTROPHE—-Shout that from the rooftops, folks!
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/oct/22/trump-thinks-scientists-are-split-on-climate-change-so-do-most-americans?utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=GU+Today+USA+-+Collections+2017&utm_term=288237&subid=12374406&CMP=GT_US_collection
Comment by dumboldguy — October 23, 2018 @ 2:31 am |
Yawn…
Comment by Adolf Goreing — October 24, 2018 @ 10:41 pm |
This is a “candid analysis” of the causes of global warming on “mainstream TV”? ROTFLMAO!
It is ignorant opinion from a RWNJ conspiracy theorist and his lying “guest” on a mainstream RWNJ TV channel (FAUX News). Thirty-nine plus minutes of propaganda filled with misrepresentations, distortions, and outright lies about the science of global warming. What a waste of time (unless, of course, you are a low-IQ science-denying moron wearing a MAGA cap—in which case, take notes and BELIEVE!).
Comment by dumboldguy — October 23, 2018 @ 1:48 am |
Well my friend, Perhaps you should change your name to “Smart thoughtful Guy” and then you would understand the video and would have understood the significance thereof.
Of course there is not 97% consensus. I not only have read the three papers which came to this conclusion but I have also analysed the data upon which they were based.
So Smart Thoughtful Guy, why don’t you try doing the same and then come to a real conclusion about this crazy world we live in.
Cheers
Roger
Comment by rogerthesurf — October 23, 2018 @ 6:10 pm |
Smart Thoughtful Guy,
It is obvious from your hysterical comments, of which I have no intention to publish on my site, that you have not read or understood the background of the “papers” that the so called 97% is based upon.
Neither have you understood why the video is so interesting which is because for once, proper science principles are being used to expose the claims of this 97% you mention.
I suggest that the news media and the IPCC, especially the “Summary for Policy Holders” are not purveyors of the truth or good science.
So I apologise in suggesting you drop the “Dumb” from your name. As you make no effort to analyse the truth, maybe your name is appropriate.
Cheers
Roger
Comment by rogerthesurf — October 24, 2018 @ 7:43 am